Showing posts with label Investment Strategies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Investment Strategies. Show all posts

Monday, May 6, 2013

Consolidating Brokerage Accounts

Right now my money is distributed in 10 different accounts - surely not an ideal situation. So, to remedy, I have taken the following two steps:

  1. Transfer out of Scottrade: Turner has been moved from Scottrade to Fidelity. It is a non-deductible IRA - and is better positioned with all the other IRAs in my Fidelity account.
  2. Roll out old 401K to Fidelity: Durer, an old 401K account, has been merged with Monet, a Fidelity Rollover IRA as part of the rollover process. This helps me get out of stupid fees for old 401Ks. Also, IRAs have much wider investment choices. The Durer account is no more. Monet is now a fat 5 Units account - 4th largest account in the portfolio.
Now I have accounts with Fidelity, Vanguard and TD Ameritrade. Total of 9 accounts.

Today's art is also from my recent visit to Rome. Part of the ceiling of the Gesu Church - home of the Jesuits. One place in Rome where I felt like a church actually had an air of spiritual calm, despite the ostentatious decorations.


Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Exit Strategies: Preliminary Thoughts

This post is dedicated to Exit Strategies in various accounts that I have. This is my first post in exit strategies - so these are preliminary thoughts. These will evolve as I encounter situations that will inevitably arise and force me to re-evaluate.

The first exit strategy is simple - have no exit strategy - just stay invested come hell or high water. I know that it is easily said than done - but - it is also the right approach for at least a part of my portfolio.

Exit Strategy #1: No Exit Ever

Bernini: I will not exit because I can not exit. Blessing in disguise. 
El Greco: Since this account is designated for actively managed mutual funds - I will leave the decision up to the mutual fund managers. I will stay invested in these funds.
Durer: It has a 2050 target date retirement fund - I will go with the underlying essence of this investment and not touch it until we are close to 2050.

The second exit strategy is also simple - do not exit since we are not concerned about price. These are dividend or income plays where price is only the secondary factor.

Exit Strategy #2: Why Exit, Enjoy Dividends

Klimt, Da Vinci: They hold pure debt instruments with monthly distributions. We are only interested in the distributions - so we will continue to hold them as long as they are continuing to provide reasonable distributions. I guess 5% is a good minimum floor for such distributions. So no exit as long as they continue to provide a 5%+ yield.

Renoir and Turner: They hold stocks with high dividend payouts. I am tentatively deciding that for stocks that yield more than 3% in dividends, keep holding them forever. I have currently two of these dividend stocks: INTC and VZ. I will keep them irrespective of their price as long as they continue a dividend yield of 3%+.

What about stocks that have lower dividends? Also what about broad ETFs/Mutual Funds? Lets first take the case of stocks with medium level dividends (1% < dividend yield < 3%). This case will also include broad market ETFs like SPY, EFA, VWO and the corresponding index funds. For these cases, I propose the following exit strategy:

Exit Strategy #3: 200 Day Rule

Stocks, ETFs and Mutual Funds that are primarily growth plays with modest dividends will be managed based on their price relative to their 200-Day Exponential Moving Average (EMA). When these stocks/ETFs/MFs fall decisively below their 200D-EMA, I will consider that as a signal to get out of them. This decision although will be made with an intent to get back in when the long term momentum reverses and the price goes decisively above 200D-EMA.

Currently, the following accounts will lend themselves to this category: Van Gogh and Bruegel.

Note that the 200 Day Rule is only to be applied when sufficient evidence exists that we are getting into a significant long term downturn. The bias will be towards holding on for as long as possible.

Now, we come to the most volatile (and hence needing prompt attention) part of the portfolio - growth holdings.We are keeping these mostly for price appreciation without regard to dividend levels. Such instruments demand swift movement out when the price is not moving in the right direction. So, for these, I propose the following exit strategy:

Exit Strategy #4: 100 Day Rule

Pure growth plays will have the 100 Day EMA as the exit benchmark. I do not have any stock that falls in this category - but the 4 units currently kept for trend trading will move here as I get away from trend trading.

Rethinking Active Investing Approach

According to the last Taking Stock post, only 4 units out of a total portfolio of nearly 42 units is kept aside for trading - and I wonder whether it is worth my time to actively explore short to medium term trading. Since almost all of my portfolio are in tax deferred accounts, I can take a very long term view of them - so I wonder whether it would be best for me to focus only on asset-allocation type of investing and buy-and-forget type of investing. Let go of trend-trading.

Although I am am sure that I can be successful doing trend trading, it perhaps needs more time on a more consistent basis than I have to spare.

I am going to look for more long term targets from now on. I need to get those 4 units working for me. The task now is to identify four good stocks as targets for these 4 units at one unit each. I currently have two dividend plays (INTC, VZ) and one combined play (DEO) stocks. It would make sense to look for some growth plays next.

On a related note, I need to clearly articulate my exit strategies in face of market upheaval. Which accounts do I continue to stay invested in an weather the storm? Which accounts I use to strategically exit with intention to re-enter at friendlier times? In such cases, what will be my exit and entry points? I will tackle these in a subsequent post.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Market Knows Best

Following my earlier discussion of INTC, I am reminded of my previous folly of thinking that I can outwit the market. I would see a stock with great fundamentals, that is going down, and would attempt to go against the market. I would win some time but would lose more often.

I finally hit rock bottom while trying to catch a falling knife with amazing fundamentals (low PE, good dividends, great growth prospects). I was so sure in my evaluation of the company that I continued to buy as the stock kept going down. By the time I reached my risk tolerance and got out, I had lost big - BIG. That was the end of my investing based on fundamentals. Since then I got into either do a buy-and-forget or when you trade, trade based solely on price and price history - no other factor - otherwise known as Trend Trading.

Using only price to make trading decisions is not as arbitrary as it sounds. The Efficient Market Hypothesis does state that all the information available to the market is already baked into the price - so there is no sustained advantage to be gained from looking at any other factor. Plus, in today's hyper-information age, the Market as a whole surely has much more information than a single investor, however gifted.

So, buy-and-forget for long term investing; only price based trend trading for short and medium term trading. This seems to be working for now.

Picasso, Guernica


Monday, November 19, 2012

Investment Strategies: Asset Allocation

This is the time tested investment model - decide on an Asset Allocation model and stick with it except for periodic re-balancing. I follow this model for my two largest accounts - ElGreco and VanGogh. More than half of the investment capital in my control follows this model.

I start with a basic Equity-Bond allocation - currently typically 70% Equity and 30% Bonds. I, then, further divide each into several low cost options including Index Funds. Equity is divided into US Equity, Non-US Developed World and Developing World. Bonds are divided into Corporate Bonds and US Treasuries.

I re-balance the portfolio into the benchmark asset allocation ratios once every three months. The asset allocation accounts are performing well this year - in line with the overall market doing well.

Botticelli, The Birth of Venus

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Investment Strategies: Buy and Forget

This is the simplest of Investment Strategies that I use - buy something good and forget about it for a long time. Let the market do its magic. Ideally, one would want to buy a growth stock and hold for the growth to materialize. However, it is difficult to pick a good growth stock that will maintain its momentum. So, I am have been a little conservative with my stock selection for Buy and Forget - I have gone for high dividend picks that are market leaders in their industry.

Current I have the following Buy and Forget selections:
A total of 7 Units. 

It is good to have a part of the portfolio in a position where I don't have to stress over how to manage them. I am looking to transfer over more of my unused cash towards Buy and Forget opportunities - perhaps a more growth oriented choice next time.

Van Gogh, The Potato Eaters